Tulsa Dog Bite Attorneys

Aggressively Pursuing Justice & Compensation for Dog Bite Victims

While dogs are widely considered to be man’s best friend, they can still bite when they feel threatened or provoked. Even a friendly or familiar animal can inflict lasting harm and trauma on victims. At JJ Law, we understand the shock, stress, and uncertainty of suffering a dog bite injury. Our dog bite attorneys are committed to recovering the full settlement you need to focus on healing. 

Since 2015, our firm has empowered everyday people to take back their lives after wrongful injuries. When you partner with our skilled advocates, you can expect dedicated representation backed by over 30 years of collective experience and proven results. We prepare every case for trial and never shy away from litigation if necessary to achieve the just outcome you deserve, giving you peace of mind that your health and future are in trusted hands. 

If you were bitten by a dog in Tulsa, our attorneys can fight for the fair compensation you deserve. Contact us online to discuss your case.

Who Is Liable for a Dog Bite in Oklahoma?

Under Oklahoma’s strict liability law, the dog’s owner is typically responsible for dog bite injuries. This applies when the dog bites a person without provocation and the victim was lawfully on the property. 

Does Oklahoma Have Strict Liability for Dog Bites?

Yes. State law holds dog owners strictly liable for bites if the victim did not provoke the dog and was legally on public or private property at the time (4 O.S. 42.1).

Can I Seek Compensation Even if the Dog Has Never Bitten Before? 

State law does not require prior knowledge that the animal was dangerous, meaning the owner can be held strictly liable even if the dog was not aggressive in the past. However, there are certain exceptions to this rule, such as bites that occur in rural areas without U.S. mail delivery service (4 O.S. § 42.3). Seeking legal counsel is important to understand your rights and legal options. 

Do I Have to Prove the Dog Owner Was Negligent to File a Claim?

While the strict liability rule does not require you to prove negligence to recover compensation, state law also allows negligence claims to be filed in lieu of or in addition to strict liability claims. 

Negligent claims argue that negligent handling or ownership directly caused the victim’s injuries, such as failing to restrain a known aggressive dog, ignoring leash laws, or allowing a dangerous animal to roam freely. 

Below are some common circumstances for negligence claims:

• The defendant is not the dog’s owner. Strict liability only applies to owners. If the defendant was a landlord, property manager, dog walker, or caretaker, a negligence theory may be a viable path forward.
• The dog attacked, but did not bite. If the dog inflicted injuries without an actual bite, such as scratching, clawing, or knocking down the victim, strict liability does not apply and a negligence claim may be pursued. 
• The dog’s dangerous tendencies were known or foreseeable. If the owner knew or should have known the dog was dangerous and failed to take reasonable precautions, this may support a negligence claim.
• Punitive damages are sought. Strict liability focuses on responsibility regardless of fault, while negligence claims can introduce carelessness, recklessness, or disregard for safety that may support punitive damages.